The Myth of the Playoff Foul
By mW on May 14, 2009
Here are things you will hear: “That’s good Playoff basketball.” Or “a good hard Playoff foul.” Perhaps “they tend to let them play in the Playoffs.” Bullshit. Bullshit. And…..bullshit. Maybe I’m crazy, but I’ve never read the Playoff Rulebook. I guess it’s different than the one they use in the regular season. Oh wait, it’s not. Well then, listen closely. A foul is a foul is a foul. Yet there is a long-standing Myth that teams like the Celtics, Rockets, Cavs, or surprisingly, and at least for this year, the Nuggets, play good defense and this is proven in the Playoffs. But if you’re slapping elbows and hands to get steals, making body contact though your hands are clean, or if you in any way impede the offensive player’s motion when you’re not set, it’s a foul. Period.
The concept that refs should “just let them play” in the Playoffs is insane. Listen, like anything involving logic, which is pretty much everything, you can isolate the truth through variables. Imagine someone trying to convince you that their team could field six players against your team’s five because it’s the Playoffs and they’re just willing to take that extra step to win. It would be absurd. Okay, but why? Why is it absurd? Well, first of all, it violates the rules. Second, it gives the other team an unfair advantage. Third, it’s pretty fucking obvious. Okay. Well, then, what about if you let a defensive player hack an offensive player? That’s against the rules, gives the defensive player an unfair advantage, and generally is pretty fucking obvious. Ultimately, the result is no different than fielding an extra player. Is one more obvious than the other? Sure. But is one more excusable than the other? No. Both are ILLEGAL.
The general belief that the Playoffs should be treated this way is bad enough. But what really aggravates the situation is that some teams, who are perceived as good defensive teams, are less likely to be called for fouls, even if they commit them, because it is assumed that they are just playing good defense, and they get the benefit of the doubt. But the fallacy of this logic is that they very well may be perceived to be good defenders because they’ve gotten away with it in the past. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. Also, when you call plays different in the Playoffs, then all of sudden, players who have gotten used to a certain level of contact have no idea what they can or cannot do on the floor. This freezes them, and makes them appear to be slow, indecisive, or just poor defenders. Yet, this is something attributable to poor officiating more than personal deficiencies.
Even worse, this kind of game calling sets the scene for chaos. Or worse, for someone to get hurt. Because as we’ve seen with, significantly this year, the Nuggets, when you let a team manhandle the other, two things happen. One, the other team gets frustrated, and tends to commit harder fouls, which only exacerbates things. (I know, it’s no excuse, but to psychologically frustrate one team to the glee of the other is in itself an unfair advantage, especially in basketball, the most psychological of sports.) But beyond that, the team creating the contact in the first place, once not getting whistled for what is ostensibly illegal contact, tends to keep creating harder and harder contact, because when you’re not called for a foul, the tendency is to try and see how far you can push things, to see what you can get away with. So these teams keep fouling harder and harder, until all of a sudden flagrants and techs are flying, bodies are flying, people are getting hurt, and the refs have lost all semblance of control. It’s ridiculous.
Yet, the NBA and their TV mouthpieces just pretend it’s so hard, and the Fates forbid anyone but Jeff Van Gundy criticize the refs (and even for that, Stern once again, took an on camera jab at JVG; Stern is like the Borg: resistance to him is futile). Sure, basketball happens fast live. No doubt. It is hard to call. But it can be better. Don’t be fooled. And the changes aren’t that complex. 1. Call it the same way over the course of the regular season and the Playoffs. 2. Encourage refs to watch each others’ games and try to establish consistent calls from ref to ref. 3. Standardize when you use replay; as it is, sometimes they use it and sometimes they don’t, and it’s insane how some obvious calls are missed because refs would rather huddle for 60 seconds and talk it over to get it wrong rather than take 30 seconds to look at the screen right off the court to get it right. That the NBA doesn’t do these things doesn’t just do a disservice to the players and the fans, but the game itself.
So when people tell you about “Playoff Basketball,” tell them to fuck off. Hitting shots with a guy in your face is Playoff Basketball. Trying to fight through dudes hacking you? That’s bullshit. We all deserve better.
No one knows. But I’ll tell you what I’m not going to do. I’m not going to pull stats. Plenty of blogs do that. Plus, after a year of comparisons, I’m not convinced the answer can be found in numbers. Instead, I”m going to work through a logical progression of what has changed.
That brings us to Anderson for Marks. Okay, Birdman didn’t play much last year, and I like Marks, but can anyone say we didn’t make a horrible move by letting him go? And Devin Brown? I like his hustle. But the fact that he plays over a former starter, when the man has never had the talent to consistently start in this League is crazy. Oh, and one other thing. A key part of our stretch run last year was Julian Wright, who this year, barely plays because Byron is too stubborn to give him the minutes to learn how to be a better player. Huge mistake.
Is it fair that a starter loses his spot due to injury? I don’t know. But considering Mo already played the least amount of minutes among all Hornets starters last year, we knew it wasn’t about starting. It was about getting minutes. To Mo’s credit, he got that, saying all along, he just wanted to contribute, to help the team, and was the consummate professional at all times, never complaining. But here’s the rub: the minutes suddenly weren’t there. Inexplicably, despite having the talent to make him a starter on a 56-win team, Byron Scott refused to give Mo any minutes.


No iffs ands or buts. Well, unless we put up like 18 three-pointers, but Butler, Mo, and the rest of the cast haven’t seemed to have been putting up that many lately, let alone making them all. But otherwise, if our two All-Stars don’t rip it up, well, it’s back to the Ledge for Hornets fans. (Speaking of, haven’t seen those Phoenix people lately…where they at?) But I don’t see our guys failing. Win or lose, these two are going to leave it all out there.
